🔗 Share this article

Turns out he endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.